Beach, D. (2017). Process Tracing Methods in the Social Sciences. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, 1-21. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.176
Tidskriftsartikel
Crasnow, S. (2017). Process tracing in political science: What's the story?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 62, 6-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.03.002
Tidskriftsartikel
Field, A. P. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5 uppl.). London: Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781526419521
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
Tidskriftsartikel
Jesson, J. K., Matheson, L., & Lacey, F. M. (2011). Doing your literature review : traditional and systematic techniques (1 uppl.). Los Angeles, Calif. ; London: SAGE. ISBN: 9781848601536
Bok / Antologi
Landman, T., & Carvalho, E. (2017). Issues and methods in comparative politics : an introduction (Fourth edition.). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. ISBN: 9780415538299
Bok / Antologi
LIEBERMAN, E. S. (2005). Nested Analysis as a Mixed-Method Strategy for Comparative Research. American Political Science Review, 99(3), 435-452. DOI: 10.1017/s0003055405051762
Tidskriftsartikel
Mahoney, J. (2016). Mechanisms, Bayesianism, and process tracing. New Political Economy, 21(5), 493-499. DOI: 10.1080/13563467.2016.1201803
Tidskriftsartikel
Mahoney, J., & Larkin, T. (2009). Comparative-Historical Analysis in Contemporary Political Science. I The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology (1 uppl., ss. 737-755). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kapitel i bok (antologi)
Munck, G. L., & Snyder, R. (2007). Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics. Comparative Political Studies, 40(1), 5-31. DOI: 10.1177/0010414006294815
Tidskriftsartikel
Papaioannou, D., Sutton, A., Carroll, C., et al. (2009). Literature searching for social science systematic reviews: consideration of a range of search techniques. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 27(2), 114-122. DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00863.x
Tidskriftsartikel
Petticrew, M. (2015). Time to rethink the systematic review catechism? Moving from ‘what works’ to ‘what happens’. Systematic Reviews, 4(1), 1-6. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0027-1
Tidskriftsartikel
Ricks, J. I., & Liu, A. H. (2018). Process-Tracing Research Designs: A Practical Guide. PS: Political Science & Politics, 51(4), 842-846. DOI: 10.1017/s1049096518000975
Tidskriftsartikel
Seawright, J. (2016). Multi-method social science : combining qualitative and quantitative tools (1 uppl.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN: 9781107483736
Bok / Antologi
Small, M. L. (2011). How to Conduct a Mixed Methods Study: Recent Trends in a Rapidly Growing Literature. Annual Review of Sociology, 37(1), 57-86. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102657
Tidskriftsartikel
Ytterligare artiklar kan tillkomma.
Text
Referenslitteratur
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2019). Process-tracing methods : foundations and guidelines (Second Edition.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. ISBN: 9780472131235
Bok / Antologi
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2017). Qualitative inquiry & research design : choosing among five approaches (Fourth edition). Los Angeles: Sage Publications. ISBN: 9781506361178
Bok / Antologi
Owen, J. M. (1994). How Liberalism Produces Democratic Peace. International Security, 19(2), s. 87. DOI: 10.2307/2539197
Tidskriftsartikel
På du.se använder vi kakor (cookies) för att ge dig en bra upplevelse på vår webbplats. Med hjälp av webbanalys kan vi anpassa webbplatsen ytterligare. Genom att surfa vidare godkänner du att vi använder kakor.